Anyway, when I first started my latest painting with my new Gamblin artist paints, I was pissed! The colors were a lot less workable, probably because of the higher pigment to oil ratio they had compared to the student grade crap I was used to. I like to paint right of the tube and don't usually thin with a medium, so getting the blank canvas covered with paint was rougher going than I was used to. Later once I had the underpainting finished things got easier, and I started to like my new paints. Then when I was nearly finished, I took an older painting done in student grade paint out of storage and compared it to my new painting done in artist grade. I was amazed at the difference! The colors in the older one looked so drab and dull next to my new work on the easel. So until this week I was prepared to write a new post extolling the virtues of artist grade paints and bemoaning how much time I'd wasted painting with cheap crap. But now that the painting is finally fininshed I don't know...
I mean I did use less paint, and the colors were much more opaque and covered better than the student grade I had been using. The artist grade also dried more evenly without the weird shiny spots I'd gotten used to, but after comparing the new painting to several more older paintings I've done, I'd say in most paintings the difference is not so great. Certain colors like reds and dark blues are noticeably better, but overall I've haven't cheated myself that much. Not with paint anyhow. And I've still got the same cottony unrealistic cloud formations, which if I can figure how to do properly on a test canvas I may even repaint. They're definitely the weak link here.

24" x 28", oil on wood
I've seen the painting used on the album cover at several garage sales and flea markets over the years. I didn't know until recently that the image was so famous. It's based on a sculpture called "Appeal to the Great Spirit". Thanks Wikipedia!






